Skip to content
VSVibeStack

89 tools14 shortlists9 head-to-headsupdated

Rankings are never for sale · Partner links labelled · Every release links its source

Best open-weight coding models to run locally

Published weights for a coding or agent loop on your own machine, from a small model to a very large one.

If you only try one: Flint. Recursive's open-weight model for local agentic coding. The model card lists about 39.8 billion parameters and about 2.5 billion active, Apache 2.0 weights, and a 262,144-token context. Recursive says it works with Ollama, LM Studio, and llama.cpp.

  • Updated
  • 5 picks
  • Editorial ranking, not a benchmark
  • Rankings never for sale

Our picks at a glance

Jump to full write-ups

#1 · Best local coding model

Flint

4.2/5 · Free

Recursive's open-weight model for local agentic coding.

Visit Flint

#2 · Best mid-size open weights

Nanbeige4.3-33B

4.2/5 · Free

Apache 2.0 weights aimed at coding and cowork tasks.

Visit Nanbeige4.3-33B

#3 · Best small local agent

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B

4.2/5 · Free

NVIDIA's small open model for voice assistants, characters, and device agents, with multi-turn tool use.

Visit Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B

#4 · Best large open-weight coder

Beam

4.2/5 · Freemium

Reflection's sparse mixture-of-experts model for coding and agents.

Visit Beam

Newsletter

Weekly drop

A weekly drop of new releases and ranking changes.

Confirmation goes to your inbox.

These picks already have weights out. Flint is Recursive's local coding model. Nanbeige4.3-33B is an Apache 2.0 coder. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt is the small model. Beam and Muse Spark Open are large mixture-of-experts models you can self-host. Kimi K3.1 Pro is not ranked: Moonshot says the full weights will be released by 4 Nov 2026. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is not ranked either: MiniMax says the weights will be released later. This page does not add a VRAM number unless the vendor already stated one. The apps that run these weights are on the local AI shortlist.

Related: Best tools to run AI models locally and Ollama vs LM Studio.

Category: Local models and Coding agents.

  1. 01

    Flint

    Recursive's open-weight mixture-of-experts model for local agentic coding.

    Recursive's open-weight model for local agentic coding. The model card lists about 39.8 billion parameters and about 2.5 billion active, Apache 2.0 weights, and a 262,144-token context. Recursive says it works with Ollama, LM Studio, and llama.cpp.

    FreeCoding agentsLocal models
  2. 02

    Nanbeige4.3-33B

    Apache 2.0 model for agentic coding and cowork tasks, with a 512K context.

    Apache 2.0 weights aimed at coding and cowork tasks. The model card lists 33,118,977,024 parameters, English and Chinese, and a context window of up to 524,288 tokens, with recipes for Transformers, SGLang, and vLLM.

    FreeCoding agentsLocal models
  3. 03

    Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B

    NVIDIA's open small model for local voice assistants, characters, and device agents.

    NVIDIA's small open model for voice assistants, characters, and device agents, with multi-turn tool use. The research post says target workloads fit in about 4GB. The model card lists 8 billion total parameters, 4 billion effective, a 64k context, and the OpenMDW-1.1 license.

    FreeLocal modelsChat assistants
  4. 04

    Beam

    Reflection's open-weight model for coding and agents, with a 1M context window.

    Reflection's sparse mixture-of-experts model for coding and agents. The model card lists 501.3 billion total parameters, 23.4 billion active, a 1 million token context, and Apache 2.0 weights. It is the large self-hosted pick.

    FreemiumCoding agentsLocal models
  5. 05

    Muse Spark Open

    Meta's open-weight multimodal model for coding and agents, with a 1M context window.

    Meta's multimodal model for coding and agents: 816 billion total parameters, 42 billion active, and a 1 million token context. Meta says it runs on two Apple M5 Ultra Mac Studios through MLX. The weights use the Muse Model License, which Meta says has limited commercial terms.

    FreemiumLocal modelsCoding agents

Also in this category

These tools share a category with this shortlist and are not picks on it.

Submit your tool

Quote this ranking

Who is “Best open-weight coding models to run locally” best for?
Developers who want published coding or agent weights on their own machine, including a small model.
Why is “Best open-weight coding models to run locally” ordered this way?
Local coding models first, then the small on-device model, then large open weights. Models whose weights are not released yet are left off.
When was “Best open-weight coding models to run locally” last updated?
Last updated Oct 26, 2026.